
International
Association of Korean Language Education
Article 1 (Purpose)
The purpose of this regulation is to establish the research ethics that members
of the International Association of Korean Language Education must adhere to
when conducting academic research and presenting research papers. It also
outlines the ethical guidelines required for the publication of the
Association’s journal.
Article
2 (Code of Ethics for Authors)
1. Members of the
Association shall not present research findings that they did not conduct as if
they were their own. When including results from other researchers in their
papers, they must properly cite the source and refrain from misrepresenting
these findings as their own.
2. Members shall
not submit previously published research (including all or part of their
dissertation) as if it were new work, whether domestic or foreign. When using
excerpts from their own previously published studies, they must use citations.
3. Members shall
not falsify or manipulate data during the research process. Data generated
during the research must be retained for a minimum of two years.
4. A member can
only be credited as an author if they have actively contributed to or conducted
the research. Family members or minors who were not involved in the study must
not be listed as co-authors. Additionally, in collaborative research, members
must respect the copyrights and usage rights of their fellow researchers and
appropriately acknowledge them as co-authors.
5. AI tools and other non-human technologies shall not be recognized as authors. If any portion of the research content is generated using such technological tools, the researcher bears full responsibility for the content’s accuracy and authenticity.
Article
3 (Editorial Ethics Code)
1. Members of the
editorial board shall determine the publication of submitted manuscripts
fairly, evaluating them based on quality and adherence to submission
guidelines, without influence from personal bias or relationships.
2. Editorial Board
members should assign the evaluation of submitted manuscripts to reviewers with
relevant expertise and the capacity for impartial judgment. To ensure fairness,
contributors and individuals affiliated with the same organization as the
contributor must be excluded from the review process.
3. Editors must
maintain the confidentiality of both the content of the manuscripts under
review and the review outcomes.
Article
4 (Code of Ethics for Reviewers)
1. Reviewers must
conduct evaluations in good faith within the time frame established by the
judging regulations and promptly notify the editorial board of their results.
2. Reviewers
should assess papers based on objective criteria, independent of their own
academic beliefs or personal relationships with the author.
3. Reviewers are
required to keep the content of the papers under review and the results of
their evaluations confidential.
Article
5 (Composition of the Research Ethics Committee)
1. A research
ethics committee shall be established and operated to address ethical issues
related to the research and publication of the Association.
2. The committee
shall consist of two ex-officio members, including one chairperson, and three
appointed members.
3. The ex-officio
members shall include the editor-in-chief and one vice-president (in charge of
research), with these positions filled by appointments made by the president
from among the directors. The editor-in-chief shall serve as the chairperson of
the committee.
Article
6 (Operation of the Research Ethics Committee)
1. The Research
Ethics Committee shall deliberate and make decisions on the following matters:
(1) Issues related
to the establishment and operation of systems concerning research ethics and
integrity
(2) Matters
pertaining to the receipt and handling of misconduct reports
(3) Issues
regarding the initiation and conclusion of preliminary and main investigations
(4) Matters
concerning the protection of informants and measures to restore the reputation
of the investigated individual
(5) Issues related
to the processing and follow-up of results from research integrity
verifications
(6) Other matters
to be discussed by the Chairperson.
2. The Research
Ethics Committee shall conduct online and offline research ethics training at
least once a year to strengthen ethical standards among Association members.
3. Meetings shall
be convened and presided over by the Chairperson.
4. A meeting shall
be valid if at least two-thirds of the members are present, and decisions shall
be made by a majority of those present.
5. Meetings shall
be held in private.
Article
7 (Verification of Research Integrity)
1. Informants may
report research misconduct to the Research Ethics Committee in various ways,
including orally, in writing, by phone, or by email. While reports should
ideally be made under real names, anonymous reports may be considered if they
include detailed accounts and evidence of specific misconduct.
2. The
verification process for research misconduct will proceed in three stages:
preliminary investigation, main investigation, and judgment.
3. The preliminary
investigation shall begin within 15 days of notification and must be completed
within 15 days of its commencement.
4. If a main
investigation is deemed necessary following the preliminary investigation, it
shall involve testimonies from the informant, the subject of the investigation,
witnesses, references, and evidence. This investigation must be concluded
within 30 days of the preliminary findings being reported.
5. The Committee
may require the informant, the person under investigation, witnesses, and
references to provide testimony; the person under investigation must comply.
Additionally, they must respond cooperatively to the Committee’s requests for
documentation.
6. The Committee
shall grant both the informant and the person under investigation equal rights
and opportunities to express their opinions, raise objections, and make pleas.
7. The Committee
shall keep the identity of the informant confidential and take measures to
protect them from any undue pressure or disadvantage.
8. The Committee
shall ensure that the honor and rights of the person under investigation are
not violated until the verification of the alleged misconduct is completed, and
it will work to restore the individual’s reputation if the allegations are
found to be unfounded.
9. All aspects of
the investigation—including reports,
inquiries, deliberations, and resolutions—shall be kept
confidential, and all participants must safeguard any information obtained
during the investigation.
10. The Committee
shall notify the informant of the investigation results and provide them with
an adequate opportunity to explain their position before a decision is made.
11. After
confirmation by at least two-thirds of the attending members and approval by a
majority, the results shall be communicated to both the informant and the
person under investigation.
Article
8 (Sanctions and Follow-up Measures)
1.
If a violation of research ethics is reported during the review of the paper
concerned, the review will be discontinued, and if the violation of research
ethics is found after the publication of the paper, the publication of the
paper will be canceled, and the report will be posted on the website of the
Association for one year. In addition, the author who violated research ethics
will notify the relevant institution that profited from the paper.
2.
If a violation of research ethics is found, the submission will not be allowed
to be submitted to Korean Language Education for the next 5 years.
3.
Records related to the preliminary investigation and the main investigation
shall be kept by the Research Ethics Committee for 5 years after the conclusion
of the investigation.
Addendum
1.
These regulations shall be effective from November 20, 2007.
2.
These regulations were amended on October 20, 2008, and shall take effect on
December 1, 2008.
3. These regulations shall be amended on April 25, 2021, and shall take effect on June 1.
4. These regulations shall be amended on April 6, 2025, and shall take effect on June 1.